You may also send your tax Deductible* donations to:
Vermont Health Care for All
PO Box 1467
Montpelier, VT 05601 * Vermont Health Care for All, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit
corporation and your contributions are tax-deductible to the full extent
allowed by law.
Book For Sale
At the Crossroads: The Future of Health Care in Vermont

To read a chapter for FREE
or to Learn More >
|
 |
Get Involved:
Tips on Writing Letters and Op-Ed Pieces
to the Editors of Vermont Papers
We've collected some samples and information for you to review, revise
to fit your town, and send to your local paper. Here are some suggestions
made by David Shipley of the New York Times for letters to the editor
and op-ed authors.
- Letters to the editor usually respond to an article or editorial
that appeared in the paper.
- Op-ed pieces tend to cover subjects and make arguments that have
not been covered elsewhere in the editorial space or are current
topics of wide interest and debate.
- Editors look for timeliness, ingenuity, strength of argument,
freshness of opinion, clear writing and newsworthiness.
- Personal experiences and first-person narrative can be great,
particularly when they illustrate a larger idea. So is humor, when
it's funny. Eschew, um, I mean, stay away from Olympian language
and bureaucratic jargon (infrastructure, inputs, outlays). Write
the article the way you'd like to write it — not the way you think
an editor wants it.
- Make one argument thoroughly, point by point; the more detail
the better. If you try to do too much, you can wind up with an article
that, in striving to say everything, ends up saying nothing.
- Also, you shouldn't feel that you have to rely on the written
word alone. Maybe your point is expressed best in a chart, a graphic,
an annotated illustration or a series of photographs.
In Vermont, most local papers have similar approaches.
- Limit letters to the editor to 200-300 words. An op-ed piece can
be as long as 700 words. It's important to check with the editor
about size.
- Since papers prefer material that hasn't appeared elsewhere in
exactly the same form, it is best to put things in your own words
or revise the sample to reflect you.
- Usually editors prefer several months between publications from
a contributor. Enlist some friends to join in the letter writing
campaign.
The Sample Topic below includes bulleted information and a simple conclusion
or call to action. We've included references. They are intended as a
resource and will always benefit from revisions or additions. We will
add more topics in months ahead, and we welcome suggestions from you.
Please send suggestions or questions to info@vthca.org
SAMPLE TOPIC: THE POLLS TELL US AMERICANS WANT HEALTH CARE
REFORM MORE THAN TAX CUTS; IS ANYBODY LISTENING?
- The Harris Poll recently asked
thousands of Americans if they thought Health Care should be a Public
Good (Entitlement) or a Private Economic Good? The questions was:
Do you think public policy should treat health care and health insurance
more as an entitlement like education, police and fire protection
and highways or more as a kind of product or service, like cars, house,
food and clothes, or homeowners insurance where you get what you can
afford and want to pay for?
The answers were: 65 percent favored an entitlement, a universal health
insurance financed by tax payers; 23 percent favored the purchased
product approach that most of us under 65 currently have and 12 percent
were not sure.
- In an ABC News-Washington Post poll,
by an almost 2-1 margin those questioned preferred a universal government
program (62 percent) as opposed to the current employer-based system
(32 percent). More than half (54 percent) are dissatisfied with the
overall quality of health care in the United States while 44 percent
are satisfied. Many are satisfied with their personal care but they
have "significant concerns” about the health care system and they
worry about future costs, possible rationing, declining coverage if
jobs are lost, and the problems of people who lack insurance already.
Eight in 10 said it is more important to provide health care coverage
for all Americans even if it means higher taxes, than to hold down
taxes but leave some people uncovered.
- The Pew Research Center Survey's
poll found “fully 72 percent of Americans agree that the government
should provide universal health care, even if it means repealing most
tax cuts passed since Bush took office.” There were some differences
among political party affiliation: Democrats, 86 percent agree-11
percent oppose; independents, 78 percent-19 percent; and Republicans,
51 percent-44 percent. A majority (61 percent) of all those who support
universal health care think of it as a moral as well as a political
issue, while most opponents (58 percent) tend to see this in strictly
political terms.
- No wonder the politicians are talking so much about health
care. They recognize it is important to voters. Voters are listening
to them but are the politicians listening carefully to the voters?
|